Camerapedia
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==General==
 
==General==
   
Released in EDIT, the d100 was nikon's answer to canon's 10D. It features a 6.1mp sensor and teh usual raft of features you'd expect to find on a dSLR that costs £1,200. It has recently been 'replaced', in the opinion of many, by the d70 that- although costing less- offers many of the same features and even improves on a couple of the d100s (1/500 flash sync speed for example)
+
Released in 2002, the d100 was nikon's answer to canon's 10D. It features a 6.1mp sensor and the usual raft of features you'd expect to find on a dSLR that costs £1,200+. It has recently become redundant, in the opinion of many, beacause of the introduction of the d70 that- although costing less- offers many of the same features and even improves on a couple of the d100s (1/500 flash sync speed for example)
   
 
==Reviews==
 
==Reviews==
   
 
[http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond100/ dpreview review the d100 is stupid amounts of depth]
 
[http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond100/ dpreview review the d100 is stupid amounts of depth]
  +
[http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d100.htm Ken Rockwell gives his unbiased opinion]

Revision as of 20:41, 25 November 2004

General

Released in 2002, the d100 was nikon's answer to canon's 10D. It features a 6.1mp sensor and the usual raft of features you'd expect to find on a dSLR that costs £1,200+. It has recently become redundant, in the opinion of many, beacause of the introduction of the d70 that- although costing less- offers many of the same features and even improves on a couple of the d100s (1/500 flash sync speed for example)

Reviews

dpreview review the d100 is stupid amounts of depth Ken Rockwell gives his unbiased opinion